|
Truth
in Labeling
3/28/09
We often hear about
a need to read the labels on various products so we can properly assess
their value or potential harmful effects. The assumption is that the label
correctly describes the contents and therefore allows one to correctly
evaluate the product.
One area where the
consumer is very likely to be misled by the labels is in the area of religion.
Vague and misleading terms and a mystifying jargon are the bread and butter
of much religious expression. If the average citizen attends the average
church and listens to the typical sermon will they readily understand
what is said? Probably not.
Now I suspect that
many routine church goers will fault the average citizen for their own
misunderstanding. Being too worldly and ignorant of the word of God supposedly
prevent one from receiving God's message. This kind of thinking makes
the failure of the church to get its message across the responsibility
of the potential hearer. That is seems just a bit too convenient. The
church claims to have a critical message to disseminate; but, if it fails,
it can just shift the blame to someone else. I tried, Lord, but those
dumb sinners were just too hard headed and sinful to understand.
Instead of self righteously
faulting the uninitiated for failing to comprehend, the church needs to
quit speaking in tradition bound vagueness and actually explain God's
requirements in terms anyone can understand and accept. Spouting the King's
English circa 1611 interspersed with the doctrinal errors of the last
two millennia will not get the job done. Calling the doctrine of eternal
punishment a part of "good news" won't cut it. The goodness
of any news must be born out by its content and effects not determined
by the label the church may chose to attach to it.
|